Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Nestle, Cargill In Human Rights Lawsuit


supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-nestle,-cargill-in-human-rights-lawsuit

  • CryptoDonate Widget for your website
  • Instant Crypto Exchange
  • Web Hosting

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Nestle USA and Cargill could not be sued for alleged human rights abuses that occurred overseas.

The plaintiffs, six Mali citizens enslaved as children on Ivory Coast cocoa farms supplying the food giants, sued Nestle and Cargill for damages, alleging the companies had aided and profited from child labor. The court ruled the corporations could not be sued for the overseas abuses.

“Nearly all the conduct they allege aided and abetted forced labor—providing training, equipment, and cash to overseas farmers—occurred in the Ivory Coast,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion.

“Pleading general corporate activity, like ‘mere corporate presence’, does not draw a sufficient connection between the cause of action respondents seek and domestic conduct,” Thomas said. (RELATED: Obama’s Solicitor General Defends Corporations Accused Of Abetting Child Slavery)

World Bank head Robert B. Zoellick looks at cocoa tree at Nestle's Ivorian cocoa and coffee research center. (Photo by SIA KAMBOU/AFP via Getty Images)

World Bank head Robert B. Zoellick looks at a cocoa tree at Nestle’s Ivorian cocoa and coffee research center. (Photo by SIA KAMBOU/AFP via Getty Images)

The plaintiffs had sued under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), a law that gives federal courts jurisdiction to hear certain civil actions filed by foreign citizens. However, the court held that this law only governs domestic cases and does not apply to extraterritorial cases, where the alleged abuses occurred.

The Supreme Court’s decision reverses the ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had allowed the case to proceed due to the fact that Nestle and Cargill conducted major business operations in the United States. The high court held this was insufficient grounds for application of the ATS.

“Allegations of general corporate activity—like decision-making—cannot alone establish domestic application of the ATS,” Justice Thomas wrote.

The decision marks a further limitation on lawsuits brought to federal courts regarding abuses abroad. In the 2018 case Jesner v. Arab Bank, the Supreme Court held that foreign corporations cannot be sued in U.S. federal courts for human rights violations overseas.

Similarly, in the 2013 case Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, the court held that there was a “presumption against extraterritoriality” which “applies to claims under the Alien Tort Statute.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Leave a Reply